Horse Evolution?
The main reason why I am addressing horse evolution is because a relative of mine was told by his college Biology professor that one of the best evidences for evolution was the evolution of the horse. I thought here we go again. Please read my page on Why David and Goliath Ministries. This page will explain why many of the intellectual elites cannot be trusted.
I, again was amazed as to how anyone with a Doctors degree and a professor, a person who is supposed to be well studied, and is supposed to know about advancements and updates in science did not know something so basic as to the fact that horse evolution had been disproved along time ago.
"The family tree of the horse is beautiful and continuous only in the textbooks. The construction of the whole Cenozoic family tree of the horse is therefore very artificial one, since it is put together from non-equivalent parts, and cannot therefore be a continuous transformation series.'
Prof. Heribert Nilsson, Synthetische Artbildung, Verlag CWE Gleerup, Sweden, 1954, pp. 551-552.
The imaginary sequence of the horse evolution is as follows.
Equus-Our modern day horse. According to Printice Hall textbooks Equus had 18 pairs of ribs.
Pliohippus resembles the modern day horse. According to Printice Hall textbooks Pliohippus had 19 pairs of ribs.
Merychippus had three toes on each foot but the two outer toes hardly reached the ground.
Mesohippus had three toes on each foot. According to Preintice Hall textbooks Mesohippus had 15 pairs of ribs.
Hyracotherium (Eohippus) Two modern day horses (Equus Nevadenis and Equus Accidentalis) have been found in the same fossil stratum as Eohippus. This fact is fatal to horse evolution.
Eohippus had four toes on his front legs and three toes on his hind legs. According to Printice Hall text books Eohippus had 18 pairs of ribs. Eohippus is similar to the Hyrax in Africa. The Hyrax is not even on the horse family. Its a Rock Badger of all things.
It is interesting when you understand what happens when a persons bias in evolution will influence him to make so many conjectures based on an animal such as Eohippus. Eohippus is no more a horse than a rhinoceros is like giraffe.
Perhaps if the donkey and the horse had become extinct before anyone had seen them alive someone finding there fossils might conjecture that the horse evolved from the donkey.
Think about what you just read about the pairs of ribs in each horse (or so called horse Eohippus) If the evolution of the horse is true than why the inconsistent number of ribs in each horse; shouldn't the modern horse have more or at least as many as Philohippus? Why does Merychippus have fewer ribs than Eohippus?
Think about what you just read about the toes on each horse. The more modern horse has no more toes; it has a hoof. I thought in evolution you gained faculties not loose them. I guess then in evolution you have to loose something to gain something?
These different horses that we have just looked at are like considering the approximately 250 different varieties of dogs; there are dogs that are as small as just a few pounds to weighing as much as a man.
These different horses that we have looked at are just varieties of horses. No one has ever found a transitional form between any one of these horses and between Eohippus and the horse.
One of the top evolutionists in the world writes.
"The uniform continuous transformation of the hyracotherium (Eohippus) into Equus, so dear to the hearts of generations of textbook writers, never happened in nature,"
Simpson, George Gaylord, Life of the Past, Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, 1953, p.119.
Did you read that? In other words what he is really saying, the evolution of the horse did not happen at all!
I will be adding more to this page later.
