It never seizes to amaze me how far an individual will go to try to give a materialistic view of origins so as to psychologically seperate God from his creation. From a biblical and scientific standpoint the so called big bang could never have happened.
(Rom 1:20 KJV) For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
(Col 1:16 KJV) For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:
(Heb 11:3 KJV) Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.
These verses are telling us that the creation of the world was a miracle, outside of the realms of science. Science is only a tool, and science changes all the time; all science can tell us about the creation of the world is give us evidence that there is a creator; it cannot tell us how God did it. Trying to use science to explain the creation of the universe is like a so called christian setting dates as to when Jesus will be coming back. The Bible makes it very plane that no one knows the day or the hour.
THE ONLY REASON THE BIG BANG IS TAUGHT BECAUSE IT DOES NOT REQUIER A CREATOR. THE BIG BANG WAS CONCOCKTED IN SUCH A WAY THAT IT CAN ALL BE EXPLAINED WITHOUT A PERSONAL GOD. CHRISTIANS WHO BELEIVE THAT IT COULD HAVE HAPPENED SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF THEMSELVES. WHEN GOD CREATED THIS WORLD HE DID IT THROUGH A MIRACLE NOT SCIENCE. SCIENCE DOES NOT HAVE THE CAPABILITY TO EXPLAIN CERTAIN THINGS. SCIENCE IS A TOOL WHICH MEANS IT HAS ITS LIMITATIONS. SCIENTISTS ARE WRONG MORE TIMES THEN THEY ARE RIGHT. THE ONLY REASON WHY EVOLUTION CAN BE TAUGHT IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS IS BECAUSE IT DOES NOT REQUIER A CREATOR.
(Psa 33:9 KJV) For he spake, and it was done; he commanded, and it stood fast.
(Psa 148:5 KJV) Let them praise the name of the LORD: for he commanded, and they were created.
It becomes very obvious that God spoke things into exsistence, so it is imposible to explain from a scientific standpoint as to how God did it because miracles are beyond the realms of science.
People who do not put there faith in a creator personal, God will go to great lengths at putting there faith in only what they can see, out of fear contridicting themselves for they cannot see atoms, air, gravity ect.
Many so called christians become confused and fearful adopting the same ideas of the world as to the origin of the universe so they don't feel left out. Some Chrisitans do get caught in this trap of trying to materialistically explain the origin of the universe adopting materialistc, evolutionary ideas from the world, and many of these people who are still promoting the big bang are athiests whos bias is evolution not science.
(1 Tim 6:20 KJV) O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:
We must not be naive and understand the fact that the whole reason for inventing the idea of the big bang was to leave a personal God out of the picture, to try to seperate the creator from his creation. Many so called christians will never want to see it that way for the same reason that many christians don't want to see the truth about masonry because they want to yoke up with the world; they are affraid of being a peculiar people. Sometimes I think some christians are the most naive people on this earth and some times they want to be that way. My proof of this is I have meet so called christians who were in the masonic lodge and believed that masonry was not a cult but a do-gooders club. While at the same time unsaved people will actually admit that masonry is there religion and the meetings at the masonic temple are there church service and the founder even has admitted that it is a pagan religion. By the same token I have meet naive ignorant christians who say the big bang is not evolution, but when I read the science textbooks that promote the big bang they teach that it is called "the evolution of the universe". I even have a video promoting the big bang where the scientists who have taken part in the construction of the big bang freely admit it is the evolution of the universe.
The bible says "My people are destroyed for a lack of knowledge:" Hosea 4:6
With this in mind read my up coming article addressing the Watcman on the Wall Ezekiel 33-36
The Events of the Big Bang
I collect Science textbooks so I am well aware as to what they teach about the origins of the universe.
I find it interesting that many textbooks are in disagreement about the big bang one will say the big bang was an actual explosion like a bomb going off another textbook will say it was not an explosion at all. I wish that evolutioists would be a little more consistant and quit saying that creationists are in consistant when the evolutionists have the same problem except only worse. I will prove that accusation in an up coming article.
Note many scientists and textbooks that promote the big bang don't all agree on every detail so I will do the best I can to be fair about explaining the events as they (Evolutioists) explain it.
About 18-20 billion years ago their was a dot smaller than the period on this page. This dot had all the matter in the universe in it. Note- In other words this dot had all the matter to make up every star and planet in exsistence all of nature and man. This dot began to spin so fast that it came apart or exploded, thus starting the expanding universe as the evolutionists state it. Then about 4.6 billion years ago the earth cooled down and formed into a hardy rocky crust. Oceans were formed as it rained on the rocks for millions of years. Swirling in the waters of the oceans is a bubbling broth of complex chemicals. However the progress from a complex chemical soup to a living organism is very slow. Note it is so slow it is totaly stopped it does not even happen. All the matter and energy will once again be packed into a small area. This area may be no bigger than the period at the end of this sentence. Then another big bang will occur. A big bang may occur once every 80 to 100 billion years. Most of this material was taken out of Prentice Hall Earth Science textbook.
By this humanistic evolutionary explanation of the origin of the universe a person would be forced to come to the conclusion that life has no meaning. If we are all going to get crunched in about 80 to 100 billion years then obviously we do not have control over our own destiny like many humanists say we do so the very idea of evolution contridicts humanisim. Note evolution is the basis for humanism. Read my page on the Philosophy and Religion of evolution.
Scientific Reasons why the Big Bang is a Big Dud.
1) An explosion does not produce order it produces disorder. If you believe in the big bang then to be consistant you would also have to believe that throwing a stick of dynamite into a Volkswagon Beetle will produce a Corrvette. Thats more faith then I have!
2) There a nine planets in our solar system, Venus, Uranus and Pluto rotate backwards. There are approximatley 60 moons in our solar system, at least 6 of those moons rotate backwards. Jupiter, Saturn and Neptune have moons revolving in both directions.
The Big Bang violates the law called Conservation of Angular Momentum.
This law states that an object thrown out radialy cannot give into curvilinear motion. In other words if there really was a little dot spinning and broke up forming the planets and moons like the big bang teaches then all the planets and moons should all be rotating and orbiting in the the same direction.
3) Those who still promote the big bang teach that the universe is expanding that all the galaxies and stars are being driven further apart with respect to one another with time. If this is true then with the resulting expansion how come the atoms that make up everything are not being driven apart that had to come together to make up the galaxies.
The Black Hole is imagined by many who are still trying to salvage the big bang. Some evolutionary scientists say that the reason why matter in outer space (stars, galaxies, clouds, nebuleas, ect) does not apear to be uniform is because in some places where outerspace appears to be empty there are so many stars, and the stars are so big that this produces a huge gravatational pull and not even light can escape so therefore it appears to be empty and thats why we don't see anything in that particular place, it looks empty so therefore it is called a black hole. No one has ever seen black holes because of the light so they are arguing from a lack of evidence.
4) Evolutionists say the best evidence for the big bang has been the so-called 3 degrees Kelvin back ground radiation, this is supposed to be the uniform low-energy remnant of the primeval cosmic explosion. Scientific measurments in recent years have increasingly been showing that the background radiation is not homogeneous and isotropic (that is the same in all directions), as it should be if t had been produced by the Big Bang, but its "anisotropic" in all directions in other words not uniform.
First Quasar Discovered (1962). Telescopes found a mysterious object, which was named 3C273, which had a spectrum that was unintelligible. This peculiar object radiated most strongly in the far blue and ultraviolet fringes of the visible spectrum. It was a total mystery until February 1963, when Jesse Schmidt recognized that the problem was that it had a radical 16% shift toward the red. If the speed theory of redshift, promoted by evolutionists, was correct,--that meant the object was moving away from us at 16% of the speed of light--and was a massive 3 billion light-years from earth!
As more--and apparently "faster"--quasars were discovered, the situation kept worsening. Ultimately, their existence debunked the evolutionist’s speed theory of redshift. Yet the redshift and background radiation were the only two "evidences" of an earlier Big Bang! For example, in 1977, a quasar was found which, according to the redshift theory, was moving faster (eight times faster) than the speed of light!
Background Radiation (1965). Using a sensitive radio astronomy telescope, A.A. Penzias and R.W. Wilson (researchers at Bell Laboratories), discovered low-energy microwave radiation coming from outer space. Big Bang theorists immediately claimed that this proved the Big Bang! They said it was the last part of the explosion. But further research disclosed that it came from every direction instead of only one; that it was the wrong temperature; and that it was too even. Even discoveries in the 1990s have failed to show that this radiation is "lumpy" enough (their term) to have produced stars and planets.
Steady State Universe Theory Abandoned (1965). Fred Hoyle abandoned the steady state theory entirely in a public announcement at a meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. He listed five scientific reasons why it was impossible (Nature, October 9, 1965, p. 113).
